Simply Compete Logo
for

Match Results



Tournament 2022 July Open @ Princeton Pong
Date: 07/09/2022 - 07/10/2022


Winner Loser
Name USATT# Name USATT# Event Score +/- Head to Head
Fulcomer, Dave (1628) 5937
Mayweather, William
 (
 
)
201518 Under 1750 SE-Prelims 8,-11,10,3 2 vs
Zhou, Ethan (
 
)
217684
Specht, Robert
 (
1515
)
76460 Under 1750 SE-Prelims 5,6,4 5 vs
Yao, Marcus (1762) 1132147
Fulcomer, Dave
 (
1628
)
5937 Under 1750 SE-Quarters 11,9,-7,6 3 vs
Moyer, Joshua (1719) 1171385
Wallace, Doug
 (
 
)
220019 Under 1750 SE-Quarters 8,6,6 3 vs
Leonce, Phillius (1622) 1171572
Finn, Stephen
 (
1462
)
270149 Under 1750 SE-Quarters 5,7,6 2 vs
Zhou, Ethan (
 
)
217684
Hu, Cheryl
 (
1670
)
263394 Under 1750 SE-Quarters 10,6,9 16 vs
Moyer, Joshua (1719) 1171385
Yao, Marcus
 (
1762
)
1132147 Under 1750 SE-Semis 4,6,7 13 vs
Leonce, Phillius (1622) 1171572
Zhou, Ethan
 (
 
)
217684 Under 1750 SE-Semis 13,-6,6,6 7 vs
Leonce, Phillius (1622) 1171572
Moyer, Joshua
 (
1719
)
1171385 Under 1750 SE-Finals 10,7,7 20 vs
Zhou, Ethan (
 
)
217684
Leming, Bob
 (
1489
)
263511 Under 1500 SE-Semis -7,5,7,-7,7 4 vs
Chandrasekaran, Santosh (1297) 268884
Khazan, Cyril
 (
1379
)
213161 Under 1500 SE-Semis 5,8,-5,6 16 vs
Zhou, Ethan (
 
)
217684
Chandrasekaran, Santosh
 (
1297
)
268884 Under 1500 SE-Finals 8,6,12 0 vs
Chen, Xianzhong (1829) 25249
Singh, Ajai
 (
 
)
221078 Under 1900 SE-Prelims 5,2,1 6 vs
Ammar, Ali (1871) 264944
Wallace, Doug
 (
 
)
220019 Under 1900 SE-Prelims 8,8,3 0 vs
Zhou, Zhaoqun (1879) 4287
Chen, Xianzhong
 (
1829
)
25249 Under 1900 SE-Quarters 3,5,3 6 vs
Moyer, Joshua (1719) 1171385
Yao, Marcus
 (
1762
)
1132147 Under 1900 SE-Quarters 9,10,-10,-7,9 13 vs
Zaki, Naveed (1628) 216408
Fulcomer, Dave
 (
1628
)
5937 Under 1900 SE-Quarters -6,6,9,-6,10 8 vs
Ammar, Ali (1871) 264944
Shekdar, Santosh
 (
 
)
221252 Under 1900 SE-Quarters 7,-7,-3,4,10 4 vs
Zhou, Zhaoqun (1879) 4287
Moyer, Joshua
 (
1719
)
1171385 Under 1900 SE-Semis 11,9,9 2 vs
Ammar, Ali (1871) 264944
Zaki, Naveed
 (
1628
)
216408 Under 1900 SE-Semis 4,9,5 0 vs