Simply Compete Logo
for

Match Results



Tournament LYTTC Amergy Cup - Feb 2022
Date: 02/12/2022 - 02/13/2022


Winner Loser
Name USATT# Name USATT# Event Score +/- Head to Head
Zhang, Liren (1811) 1157612
Fulcomer, Dave
 (
1541
)
5937 Under 1900 SE-Prelims 15,3,8 0 vs
Zhu, Hongxuan (1823) 218441
Yao, Marcus
 (
1666
)
1132147 Under 1900 SE-Prelims 8,8,-9,10 2 vs
Liu, Andy (1801) 264276
Brito, Ricardo
 (
1793
)
80953 Under 1900 SE-Prelims -5,8,8,4 8 vs
Doyle, Kevin (1679) 1171074
Cristoaica, Eugene
 (
1756
)
93220 Under 1900 SE-Prelims 7,11,-8,5 16 vs
Katz, David (1995) 1291
Zaki, Naveed
 (
1724
)
216408 Under 1900 SE-Prelims -7,-7,8,7,8 0 vs
Ammar, Ali (1813) 264944
Jena, Prashant
 (
 
)
1169714 Under 1900 SE-Quarters 9,6,8 10 vs
Kang, Chongsheng (1805) 3727
Zhang, Liren
 (
1811
)
1157612 Under 1900 SE-Quarters -6,9,6,9 8 vs
Zhu, Hongxuan (1823) 218441
Liu, Andy
 (
1801
)
264276 Under 1900 SE-Quarters -6,9,9,8 7 vs
Katz, David (1995) 1291
Doyle, Kevin
 (
1679
)
1171074 Under 1900 SE-Quarters 8,8,4 0 vs
Kang, Chongsheng (1805) 3727
Ammar, Ali
 (
1813
)
264944 Under 1900 SE-Semis -9,3,5,-7,6 8 vs
Katz, David (1995) 1291
Zhu, Hongxuan
 (
1823
)
218441 Under 1900 SE-Semis 6,4,6 2 vs
Katz, David (1995) 1291
Kang, Chongsheng
 (
1805
)
3727 Under 1900 SE-Finals 10,9,-16,-11,6 1 vs
Radoslavov, Gantcho (738) 1173596
Senthilkumar, Saivaishnav
 (
379
)
1173259 Under 800-Semis 3,6,3 0 vs
Radoslavov, Daniel Ray (697) 1173595
Wu, Evan
 (
243
)
1173522 Under 800-Semis 1,-7,10,9 0 vs
Radoslavov, Gantcho (738) 1173596
Radoslavov, Daniel Ray
 (
697
)
1173595 Under 800-Finals 5,8,9 6 vs
Nandyala, Srinath (
 
)
1172937
Shah, Hersh
 (
778
)
272486 Under 1600 SE-Quarters 5,9,10 0 vs
Leming, Bob (1286) 263511
Su, David
 (
1096
)
268653 Under 1600 SE-Quarters 6,-11,9,10 1 vs
Motyka, Marcin (1650) 1173787
Nandyala, Srinath
 (
 
)
1172937 Under 1600 SE-Semis 9,6,5 0 vs
Malik, Hammad (
 
)
25089
Leming, Bob
 (
1286
)
263511 Under 1600 SE-Semis 9,-9,9,-9,9 4 vs
Motyka, Marcin (1650) 1173787
Malik, Hammad
 (
 
)
25089 Under 1600 SE-Finals 9,9,9 0 vs